Virginia Tech mourners (IBTimes) |
The point I'm trying to make here is that while Cho Seung-Hui has done a terrible, despicable thing, it is obvious that he, too, was a victim. Obviously someone who was capable of something like this is someone who needed help, and badly. To be desperate enough to cold-heartedly murder 32 people and then turn the gun on oneself is incomprehensible to believe and no matter how hard we try, we will never know how that feels. While many have pointed to administrative shortcomings - the fact that the campus was not locked down as it was when an escaped con who had killed two people was rumored to be around campus - I feel that Lucinda Roy's attempts to reach out to Seung-Hui (the aforementioned English chair) should be applauded. She saw a problem and, in addition to trying to personally help the troubled student, passed on the relevant information to police. However, because there was no explicit threat in Cho's writings, the police could do nothing. He was referred to psychological services at the college, but, as I said before, it is unclear whether or not he went.
This is where the problem lies and there is a substantial gray area that is hard to navigate. Seung-Hui needed help, there is no doubt about that, but could you make him go to counseling? According to Virginia Tech's counseling website, no. It states "In all situations counselors are NOT able to initiate contact with students. Students need to contact the Cook Counseling Center for services." Therefore, unless Seung-Hui voluntarily went to the counseling center himself, no contact could be made between the two parties. This is a problem. While Lucinda Roy is most likely very intelligent, she is not a mental health professional and thus not qualified to deal with a problem as grave as Seung-Hui's. That was a job for a counseling professional who most likely have dealt with shy, "loner" students who are reluctant to going to any type of counseling or therapy.
Cho Seung-hui (Wikipedia) |
Going through the Facebook groups and scrolling through photos of Virginia Tech students and families grieving, it is obvious that this tragedy is highly emotionally charged. Many may point to my comments about Cho Seung-Hui and be tempted to attack me for defending him. Let's clear up something right now: I am not defending Cho Seung-Hui's actions in any way, shape or form. I am simply saying that he was a disturbed individual who needed help that he never received. Having been an EMT in Boston for over a year, I have seen my fair share of psychologically disturbed patients, many with violent histories. I've found myself in situations in the back of an ambulance only inches away from patients who have threatened their siblings with knives or assaulted friends or family members, and beneath all of the madness and the mental illness and whatever it is that drives these people to hurt others, there is a human being. So while the cowardly acts of Seung-Hui are his and his alone, he was a man who needed help but could not receive it because he was not in the right mind to submit himself to counseling, which he should have done, and the staff of the counseling center were severely limited by the school's rules regarding psychological practices. While it is too late to bring back the 32 people murdered yesterday, along with the gunman, maybe these tragic events will cause some colleges to take a serious look at their psychological procedures, make some changes, and hopefully prevent such a horrible tragedy in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment